The Deep Tech Negotiation Playbook | Chapter 2/4
Master the Fundraising Tug of War Before It Masters You
🌟 Welcome back to The Deep Tech Negotiation Playbook—a premium tactical series for those navigating the high-stakes world of deep technology ventures!
Software startups scale on code. Deep Tech startups scale on atoms, factories, and supply chains. Investors understand this distinction, yet too often, negotiations follow the same script—SaaS-inspired playbooks that emphasize lean operations, rapid iteration, and hypergrowth.
But Deep Tech doesn’t play by those rules.
The risk profile is different, capital flows on a different timeline, and returns aren’t measured in quick multiples but in long-term, defensible breakthroughs.
The difference between a good deal and a bad one isn’t just valuation or dilute ownership—it can introduce misaligned incentives, create untenable capital constraints, and ultimately limit a company’s ability to execute on its long-term vision.
The question isn’t if negotiation strategy is critical; it’s whether you’re approaching it with the right framework.
In Chapter 1, we broke down the fundamentals—why capital isn’t the rarest resource anymore (breakthroughs are), why investors and founders often talk past each other, and why the real product in any Deep Tech deal isn’t the technology itself—it’s equity. We explored the hidden power dynamics at play and how understanding the venture capital game is the first step toward negotiating from a position of strength.
Now, in Chapter 2, we turn to the three pillars that define the core of every Deep Tech negotiation: Market, Team, and Technology. These aren’t just diligence items—they’re leverage points that influence valuation, investor confidence, and the long-term trajectory of a company.
Market – How to prove demand before you ask for a dollar.
Team – How to turn execution ability into negotiation power.
Technology – How to frame deep innovation as an investable, scalable business.
Negotiation isn’t about who talks first, who talks loudest, or who throws out the biggest number. It’s about control. And in Deep Tech, control isn’t about cutting the best deal—it’s about setting the terms before the other side even knows what’s happening.
The biggest mistake founders make? Thinking negotiation starts when the term sheet hits the table. No—it starts long before that. It starts with how you frame your company, how you establish leverage, and how you make investors see funding you as their best possible move.
The ones who win in Deep Tech understand a simple truth—funding doesn’t follow technology; it follows execution. It follows proof. It follows teams so undeniable, so relentless, that saying no isn’t an option.
The Deep Tech Negotiation Playbook is reserved for Premium Members.
By joining The Scenarionist Premium, you’ll unlock access to this playbook, our exclusive Venture Guides, and much more—available only to our premium members. This includes our carefully curated list of 30 Venture Lessons to Build and Back Great Deep Tech Companies, distilled from the insights of 50+ Deep Tech investors and experts from around the world.
Let’s dive into Chapter 2!
Table of Contents
The Market: Validating Demand Before Negotiation
1.1 The Art (and Necessity) of Customer Conversations – Customer Discovery in B2B Deep Tech
1.2 Market Sizing: Precision Over Assumptions
1.3 Next Steps & Key Questions: Market
The Team: The Underrated Core of Deep Tech Negotiation
2.1 Founder-Market Fit: Why You? Why Now?
2.2 Building Beyond the Core Founders
2.3 Communicating the Team’s Potential
2.4 Next Steps & Key Questions: Team
3. The Technology: De-Risking the Core Innovation
3.1 The Fear Around Idea Theft
3.2 IP as a Strategic Asset in Deep Tech Negotiations
3.3 Is Your Technology Scalable?
3.4 TRLs, Valuation, and What Comes Next
3.5 Next Steps & Key Questions: Technology
Deep Tech Negotiation—Why Market, Team, and Technology Define the Deal
In the late ‘80s, a young MIT researcher stepped into a conference room packed with potential backers. He was pitching a new superconducting material that could revolutionize computing. The science was airtight. The enthusiasm? Palpable. But the room was ice-cold. One investor leaned back and asked, “So what’s the plan? Sell it to the government and hope for a check?”
The researcher wasn’t ready for that question. He had a breakthrough—but not a business. The meeting ended with polite nods and no follow-ups. A few years later, a more polished team licensed a similar technology and built what would become a billion-dollar semiconductor company. The difference? They understood that deep tech isn’t just about having the best science—it’s about proving that the market, the team, and the technology align to create an opportunity that can’t be ignored.
The Market
Innovation without demand is an academic exercise. Stakeholders—whether investors, partners, or customers—aren’t looking for “interesting.” They’re looking for inevitable. That means hard numbers, early traction, and signals of validation that can’t be brushed off. Who’s already raising their hand to buy? Which industry players are leaning in? Are there letters of intent, pilots, or contracts in place?
The difference between fascinating and funded is whether there’s tangible proof that the world is ready for this.
The Team
If technology alone were enough, research labs would be Fortune 500s. What separates a promising idea from a transformative company is the team behind it. The best teams aren’t just experts—they’re execution machines. They move fast, attract top-tier talent, and don’t flinch when things go sideways.
Stakeholders don’t just scan résumés. They look for conviction, adaptability, and a track record of making things happen. The real question is: Does this team have the DNA to go the distance?
The Technology
A patent isn’t a business model. A prototype isn’t a product. And a breakthrough is meaningless if it can’t scale.
Every stakeholder wants to know: Can this technology survive contact with the real world? Can it be manufactured efficiently? Does it have a clear competitive edge, or will it get bulldozed by incumbents or a better-funded competitor?
Tech readiness levels, supply chain feasibility, cost curves—these aren’t just technical details. They’re the difference between a promising innovation and a commercially viable business.
Each of these pillars shapes how deep tech ventures are evaluated, influencing not just whether they get funded, but on whose terms.
Negotiation isn’t about persuasion—it’s about aligning risk and reward so clearly that the only logical answer is ‘yes.’